When reviewing digital resources, I often find myself automatically questioning several factors to ensure the sources I use are legitimate. After reading Bates (2015) ‘The SECTIONs Model’, I have compiled the top five criteria I consider into ‘A’ words and refer to it as ‘The 5A’s.’
The 5A’s
- Author-Who wrote this particular journal, post, etc.? What is their credibility in relation to the topic being discussed? (In other words, are they qualified to discuss the topic).
- Accuracy-Is the information presented accurate? What do other sources say-do they agree or disagree with the statements being made?
- Accessibility-How easily can I use this information? Can I navigate where it came from and where it might lead in the future?
- Amount-Does it cost anything to utilize this resource? Are there only certain free functions available before I am required to pay or subscribe.
- Assurance-Do I feel confident that this information is legitimate? Am I comfortable with the safety measures promised when using this resource?
As I review my resources using this criteria, I can usually determine whether a source is legitimate. Occasionally, even non-legitimate sources contain references that lead me to credible resources. I often find myself scanning the references of articles to find complementary materials that help support my case.
I conducted a quick search of simulation websites for my technology integrations activity course project and came across one called Simulation Canada (2024). Although this is not an academic site, it appears focus on providing resources to enhance simulation learning in Canada. While specific authors aren’t always stated, the site features partnerships with many Canadian universities, and individual blog posts do often include authors with their credentials. The website is user-friendly, well organized, and free to access-registration only requires an email. After reading a few posts, I feel that this information is accurate and trustworthy. There are multiple resources available for anyone involved in nursing, from students to educators. Overall, I would use information from this website for my project.
References:
Bates, A. W. (2015). Chapter 10: Choosing and using media in education: The SECTIONS model. In Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/part/9-pedagogical-differences-between-media/
Simulation Canada. (2024). Professional development. Retrieved from https://simulationcanada.ca/pro-dev/our-approach/
September 27, 2024 at 6:58 pm
Jamie, the simplicity of this acronym caught my attention. Well done! I especially value the author and assurance pieces. Personally, my main struggles with technology is safety aspects and can I believe what I am reading. By evaluating the author credentials it can add clarity to the accuracy of the information provided. Your evaluation criteria hits home for me, and its easy to remember.
Thanks for sharing,
Sarah Flynn